
Progress continues in my creation of an online blog. Though I am rapidly risking the danger of blogging about blogging, and I don’t know how many people out there are really interested in this kind of thing. So instead, I will continue where I left off with my livejournal blog.
I tend to think about dimensionality in non-mathematical terms. For instance, many people believe that we, as humans, are three-dimensional creatures slowly progressing through a four-dimensional medium which we identify as time. Others seem to view us as four-dimensional creatures in a five- or six-dimensional medium; creatures which, as they pass through the fourth-dimensional medium, slowly change shape as we do when we grow from babies to adults, then to the elderly.
I’m a little more fucked-up in my view. I see us as five-dimensional creatures in a six-dimensional medium for which I have yet no name. Our five-dimensional bodies, in my view of the cosmic whosiwhatsit, move through the fourth and fifth dimensions, branching out from our births and ending in a finite, but immensely varied number of possible outcomes, each one being the end of a branch, perceived as “death.”
The possible outcomes, often described as “what-ifs,” are in my view, actual occurances of events which have simply happened on another time-line outside the one we now experience. For instance, “what-if” Kennedy wasn’t killed in 1963? Would events leading up to the moon landing, the Vietnam War and other such things have occurred? We usually refer to these other possibilities as “alternate time-lines.”
But suppose that alternate time-lines are not the only phenomena resulting from the branching five-dimensional view of our Universe? Suppose we can observe very small “perturbances” within our own time-line, which we currently can’t measure, as we don’t have the means or knowledge to do so?
Here’s one example of what I’m talking about. You wake up in the morning, realize you’re late for work and grab everything you need for the day. Wallet, glasses (if you’re myopic), watch (if you wear one) and various other items. Then, you look for your keys.
You are 100% certain that you placed your keys on the countertop with the rest of the items you need for your day. But they are absent. You look for them, unable to find them. Then, you notice them hanging on the key-rack next to the door.
There are people who believe that observation creates the Universe. In this example, the observation of the keys on the key-hook creates a “wave-function collapse” of probability. Thus the reality crashes down on you, and you remember that you put your keys there the night before.
But did you? Or is that just what happened in the reality in which you now find yourself? I call this reality a dominant reality because out of all the possible events which could have occurred, i.e. all the possible places your keys could be, the location of the keys within your dominant reality was on the hook. Even if you previously remembered that they keys were on the dresser, or the kitchen counter or even in your pants pocket, all of these possible realities are overwritten by the dominant reality in which your keys are on the key-hook.
This may sound like a load of bantha poo-doo to some, and in reality, there is no actual evidence of this phenomenon. It’s just an interesting philosophical idea. However, it might also explain deja vu, a memory which is left over from a subordinate reality. Once the subordinate memory and the dominant reality crash into one another, our brains can’t quite determine which is real, and deja vu is the result.
It could, of course, just be a glitch in the Matrix, and the black cat you just saw twice means that the Agents have bricked up all the windows in your building and cut the hard-line out.
Still, it’s an interesting thought, and it at least got me to update my new journal. Perhaps sometime, I should explain why I think the Universe is actually collapsing backward in time toward the big-bang, and that our view of a Universe in which increasing entropy is what is actually backward. While undemonstrated, this might explain why we remember the past and not the future. Much like we can see what is in front of us, but not what is behind, or memories might be a method of “seeing” what is “ahead” of us as the Universe rapidly collapses in on itself.
But right now, I have to get ready for a wedding. The main problem? Finding a wedding gown that will fit my ego.